^{This write-up originally appeared on Business Insider.}

After a rough few of a long time, Meta is traveling: Revenue is escalating yet again, earnings are way up after some distressing belt-tightening, and its stock is at a file large.

What could maybe go mistaken?

Very well, perhaps Mark Zuckerberg, its CEO, could get damage, or worse, in a cage match?

Which is what Meta is suggesting in a new Securities and Trade Fee submitting out this 7 days. In the company’s latest yearly report, it explained to investors that Zuckerberg routinely did dangerous stuff for enjoyable — and that it would be a authentic challenge for the business if he bought hurt executing that.

From Meta’s 10-K, filed beneath “danger components”:

We currently rely on the continued services and efficiency of our essential staff, together with Mark Zuckerberg. Mr. Zuckerberg and certain other users of management participate in a variety of substantial-risk things to do, these kinds of as combat sports activities, extraordinary athletics, and recreational aviation, which carry the hazard of major injury and dying.

Meta is presumably referring to Zuckerberg’s properly-documented embrace of all types of brotastic entertaining, like blended martial arts, hydrofoiling, and CrossFit. He has also been schooling to get his pilot license, The Info noted.

And he has gotten banged up along the way: Very last 12 months, he tore his ACL in a schooling struggle.

Zuckerberg undoubtedly isn’t really the only tech mogul who likes this things. His rival Elon Musk, for instance, flies himself about all the time, and he famously challenged Zuckerberg to a cage match (which some individuals insisted was going to be a serious detail but never ever panned out).

But he may possibly be the only Major Tech CEO who’s spelled that out as a challenge for traders.

Musk’s Tesla, for occasion, basically points out that the firm is “hugely dependent” on his expert services and would not point out the prospect of him crashing a single of his Gulfstreams. (It does, having said that, say that Musk “does not commit his full time and consideration to Tesla” for the reason that he’s also working SpaceX, X, and other ventures.)

Friends this kind of as Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon either say that their CEOs are vital or do not even mention them.

Meta reps did not promptly react to a request for comment. But Zuckerberg fundamentally did, by responding to a post about the 10-K filing on Threads:

It really is value pointing out that although the “danger component” part of any general public enterprise can be useful to scan, considering that it lays out all varieties of issues that could occur, it typically is not the sort of thing most buyers care about. The level is to insulate the corporation from legal responsibility in scenario something does go wrong: “See? We informed you this could materialize. Now tell your attorneys to cease bothering us.”

So while Meta does choose Zuckerberg’s effectively-currently being very severely — in 2022, it expended $15 million on own protection for him and his spouse and children — it can be not likely it thinks he’s heading to get really, actually hurt. But they’re allowing us it could take place, just in scenario.